[ contact ] [ home ] [ search ] [ submit link ] login | want to join? register in seconds!

home and garden
lawyers reviews
cosmetic surgery
cosmetic surgery cost / price site
channels:
hot tags: [all tags...]
hot tags(2): [all tags...]
[all tags...]
Washington Post Finding More Cancer Isn t the Answer
Health & Beauty related articles:
0
vote!
Democrats Cannot Use Budget Process To Expedite SCHIP Expansion (www.medicalnewstoday.com)
crawler @ 04/16/07 20:53 comments(0) report
0
vote!
Senate Bioterrorism Panel To Be Eliminated, Full HELP Committee To Take Over Responsibilities (www.medicalnewstoday.com)
crawler @ 03/20/07 20:37 comments(0) report
0
vote!
Biden Discusses Opposition To Supreme Court Opinion In Federal Abortion Ban Case (www.medicalnewstoday.com)
crawler @ 05/04/07 09:38 comments(0) report
0
vote!
Washington Post Columnist Examines Maternity Leave Policies Of Large Companies (www.medicalnewstoday.com)
crawler @ 03/15/07 16:48 comments(0) report
0
vote!
Boston Globe Reports On Internal Investigation Of Global Fund Practices (www.medicalnewstoday.com)
crawler @ 03/20/07 20:37 comments(0) report
0
vote!
Physicians Oppose UnitedHealth Group Policy To Fine Them For Out-of-Network Referrals (www.medicalnewstoday.com)
crawler @ 04/16/07 20:53 comments(0) report
Washington Post: Finding More Cancer Isn't the Answer
"The cancer diagnosed in Elizabeth Edwards and Tony Snow last month was metastatic, the form of the disease that is most dreaded because it has spread to distant organs -- and it kills. Some have seen this news as evidence that we need to look harder to find cancer earlier -- before it spreads. And also last month we learned a way to do just that for breast cancer: magnetic resonance imaging."

"The only argument against this idea seems to involve money. MRIs do cost a lot of money -- somewhere around $1,000 each. Not surprisingly, many insurers don't want to pay. So the big battle seems destined to be about who will. You will soon hear advocates talking about legislation to ensure payment and accusing those who do not want to pay for the test of denying access to lifesaving services simply to save money."

"This is wrong. Cost is an issue only if benefit has been proved. In the case of MRI, we don't know whether a benefit exists. You can't assume that expensive new technologies are better. The focus on cost distracts from the real question: Does the test help?"

"You might think that the New England Journal of Medicine answered this question when it reported in the March 29 issue that MRI finds breast cancers that mammograms miss."

"But the best test isn't necessarily the one that finds the most cancer. It turns out it is easy to find more and more cancer. Just get more tests. The harder we look, the more we find."

"In an earlier NEJM study, women were given two mammograms on the same day: One used standard X-ray films, the other used new digital technology; digital mammograms found more cancers."

"But if you look at the numbers carefully, you'll find another story. Of the 237 breast cancers found by screening, 51 percent were detected by "

" tests, and 27 percent by digital exam alone. But the remaining 22 percent were detected only by the standard mammogram! So if the goal is simply find more cancer, you'd want to have both tests."

"There is reason to wonder whether this finding has less to do with the difference between the two
... read the whole article


comments:(log in to vote on this article or comment on it)